New Delhi, August 6, 2017: Time and again, women are asked to adhere to the various roles and the principles set for us, 'for our own good'. We are asked to keep our heads low and our voices lower. We are told to restrict ourselves to the boundaries of our houses, and our opinions within the confines of our mind. These codes of conduct are embedded in the Hindu dharma, and compiled together as the Manusmriti.
Since centuries, women have been the subject of judgments. There have been countless opinions about women- all based on regressive fallacy.
Being a woman in a world where sexism forms an integral part can be quite wearisome. There are some things that a man will never hear, but women and young girls alike, have heard them enough times.
On one hand where the world thinks of India as rich in culture and heritage, little do they know it is this same culture that has, since ancient times, embedded a deeply skewed perception of the Indian women.
In an attempt to trace the origin of this retrogressive attitude attached to women, we came across the Manusmriti.
According to Hindu mythology, the Manusmriti is believed to be the word of Lord Brahma, and is classified as the most commanding declaration on Dharma. Hindu defenders consider the Manusmriti or laws of Manu as the divine Hinduism code of conduct, and accordingly the status of women as depicted in the text has been interpreted as Hindu divine law.
You may come across one of the most famous verses of the Manusmriti – "yatr naryasto pojyantay, ramantay tatr devta" (at places where women are provided place of honor, gods are pleased and reside in that household)
However, in its shade, the Hindu apologists often forget the verses that reek of outrageous abhorrence, discrimination, and bigotry against women-
Manusmriti or Manu's Laws are regarded as the dharmic codes of conduct for Hindus. Wikimedia
According to Manusmriti, a woman has to worship her husband regardless of what he does, and has to pay heed to his commands. (representational image) Wikimedia
These verses are downright demeaning and infuriating. What is even more upsetting is the fact that these aren't mere hypothesis – these have been the order of the day at a time in the Indian subcontinent. The fact that women have lived for years with such a tarnished image is out rightly nauseating.
The 'holy' text has, for the same reason, often been the center of controversy.
In March 2016, students of JNU had burnt a copy of Manusmriti for it's "extremely derogatory references against women". The then vice-president of ABVP said that by doing this, they are "burning discrimination", as reported by First post. In a similar event in June this year, the CPI (M) blamed RSS for propagating values inspired by the laws of Manu for which they received a lot of flak, as reported by ANI.
While the current society has outgrown most of what these verses project, it would be immoral to say that the Hindu dharma is now completely devoid of any such discrimination.
We claim that ours is a developed country. We are all in for gender equality and time and again remind ourselves that women are being empowered by appointing women to various honorable posts. But have our ideologies regarding women really changed?
Do we honor women like they should be, and do we value them as much as they deserve?
Or are we still tied to the chains of retrogression with religions at its commands?
– by Soha Kala of NewsGram. Twitter @SohaKala