The inauguration of a new parliament building symbolizes the strength of its institutions. It is a moment for leaders from all sides of the political spectrum to come together, setting aside their differences to celebrate the spirit of democracy.

However, the recent decision by the opposition to boycott Prime Minister Narendra Modi's inauguration of the new parliament building, demanding that the President of India perform the honors instead, is a regrettable move that undermines the essence of democracy.

The opposition's demand for the President's involvement in the inauguration is not without merit. The President of India holds a position that represents the entire nation. Involving the President would have been a symbolic gesture, reinforcing the impartiality and unity of the nation's highest office.

However, the opposition's decision to boycott the event altogether sends a message of divisiveness rather than unity. It is an unfortunate missed opportunity to put aside political differences and come together for a cause that should transcend party lines. By abstaining from the event, the opposition is missing out the significance of the occasion and depriving themselves of a platform to express their views constructively.

Boycotting the inauguration also raises questions about the opposition's commitment to democratic values. In a healthy democracy, political parties must engage in open dialogue, debate, and cooperation.

Instead of boycotting the event, the opposition could have used the occasion to engage in constructive criticism and hold the government accountable for its actions. They could have utilized the platform to voice their concerns, propose alternative solutions, and highlight issues that require attention. By participating, they would have demonstrated their commitment to democratic principles and their willingness to work towards a better future for the nation.

In conclusion, the opposition's decision to boycott Prime Minister Modi's inauguration of the new parliament building, while demanding the involvement of the President of India, is a missed opportunity for unity. By abstaining from the event, they have chosen divisiveness over constructive engagement. In a democracy, it is imperative for leaders to put aside their differences and work together for the greater good.

It is high time for all political parties to reevaluate their approach and prioritize national unity over political grandstanding. They should remember that they would be participating in the event for the nation and not just for a person.